By Eriq Gardner
for Billboardbiz
6/20/2014
The
singer-songwriter argues that a federal copyright law preempts Claudette
Robinson's claim of
being entitled to a share of his big hits.
When U.S.
lawmakers long ago decided to give authors the opportunity to terminate
copyright grants to
publishers, could they ever have imagined the novel dispute that is now playing
out between
legendary R&B singer Smokey Robinson and his ex-wife Claudette?
As
previously covered, the famous singer/songwriter behind such hits as "My
Girl" and "You've
Really Got a Hold on Me" sued his former spouse in California federal
court, seeking declaratory
relief that once he terminated rights to songs, he wouldn't have to share the reclaimed
rights with her. The defendant then filed counterclaims, pointing to a 1989 stipulated
judgment made three years after their divorce that she says entitles to her to
50 percent of
his compositions
At the heart
of the dispute lies the intersection between federal copyright law and state
family law, and for
that reason in a motion to dismiss filed earlier this month, Smokey Robinson's lawyer said
the counterclaims must fail.
"Federal
law provides that Plaintiff – alone – recaptures all rights in the copyright notwithstanding
any agreements to the contrary," states Smokey Robinson's motion. "On
the other hand,
Defendant asserts that under California community property and contract law,
she is entitled
to an undivided one-half interest in any recaptured copyrights Plaintiff may
acquire in the
future even though the marriage between Plaintiff and Defendant ended nearly 30
years ago."
Thus, in the
songwriter's eyes, if there's an "irreconcilable conflict," then
"federal law preempts
state law" under the supremacy clause of the U.S. constitution.
Since the
founding of the nation, there's always been a bit of tension between what the
federal government
is doing and the laws set up by the states, and except for an attempted divorce
by southern
states in the 1860s, everyone in the U.S. has managed to stay in a relationship together.
In answering the motion to dismiss on Thursday, Claudette Robinson's attorney says this time is no different, that her claims do no harm to legally recognized federal interests and present no preemption issues. Her legal papers place emphasis on the economic benefits of copyright, saying those are governed by state law. According to her answer, she's not attempting to interfere with his rights under the Copyright Act.
"Specifically, Ms. Robinson does not challenge Mr. Robinson’s exclusive right to decide whether to terminate prior grants," states the opposition. "Nor does she seek to interfere with whether, or under what terms, Mr. Robinson enters into new grants for (or sells) the Community Musical Compositions, now that they have been exposed to the market and can fetch the fair value Congress legislatively made available to him. Mr. Robinson must simply
BILLBOARD
BULLETIN- 6/20/14
No comments:
Post a Comment